Public to Speak on Land Use Approval Moratorium
A public hearing will be held March. 7 on the common council's proposal to prevent land use approvals from going through in two zoning districts until September.
The public will have their chance in March to weigh in on whether or not the city should impose a six-month moratorium on approvals for projects in the R1-12.5 and R1-30 zoning districts, at a public hearing in March.
The White Plains Common Council says they need the time to study the City’s land use regulations to see whether they need to be changed, made to conform with the city's comprehensive plan, or if the plan needs to be updated.
The two affected zoning districts include properties listed in 1997 Comprehensive Plain Land Use Map as “Parks and Open Space,” and include local golf courses like Westchester Hills and the former Ridgeway Country Club, recently purchased by the French-American School of New York (FASNY).
Though some members of the community have called on the City to make zoning changes in the area, which would prevent FASNY from building their proposed K-12 school on the 128-acre site—common council members say FASNY'S project has nothing to do with the moratorium.
“I do think it is important to note this legislation [local law that would approve a moratorium] is separate from the issue of the French School’s submission of a site plan to the city of White Plains,” said Councilman David Buchwald, at a Feb. 7 meeting.
The council said the moratorium is not meant to stop FASNY’s from building their school and that FASNY can still start their process of submitting approvals, which could take years. FASNY previously stated they would begin their approval process in the spring. FASNY would need a special permit to run a school on the property. If the local law is passed no approvals can be made until Sept. 15 when the moratorium ends.
“FASNY expects and is confident that the City is not intending to use the moratorium or any possible future rezoning to in any way preclude or frustrate FASNY’s plans to build a first class open space campus on the former Ridgeway property,” said FASNY spokesperson Geoff Thompson. “
Local residents and associations feared the property would be developed before FASNY bought it, and drafted zoning legislation that would require that the property stay as open space. It was submitted to the Common Council on Dec. 2. Click on the PDF below the photo to see a copy.
Local environmental organizations are concerned about the impact development would have on the property. They say new development would create impermeable surfaces and exacerbate existing flooding and drainage problems in the area, which serves as the headwater to the east branch of the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake rivers.
“Our plan will restore the natural conditions of the property, improve the existing drainage conditions and stop the use of irrigation and pesticides,” a FASNY fact sheet says. “We are exploring the possibly uncovering the underground streams if they exist, creating natural storm-water retention ponds, and using rain gardens and other green measures to bring the site back to a more natural look and feel.”
White Plains residents also have a slew of other concerns like increased traffic on their local streets and reductions in the tax base.
FASNY would not pay taxes, they are exempt since they are a school. In 2010-11 the Ridgeway Country Club, which was failing financially, paid $287,929 in property taxes. If improvements were made to the property, its value could increase and so would the amount of taxes the owner would pay. The German School, a White Plains private cultural school at 50 Partridge Rd., would have paid $1,359,802 in property taxes in 2010-11 if they weren’t tax exempt.
Some locals also fear White Plains property taxes could go down since some who had a beautiful quiet golf course in their backyard, would now be looking at and listen to K-12 students outside during recess.
FASNY says surrounding property values would at the very least be maintained, and that families will move to White Plains to be near the school and pay taxes, but not putt a burden on White Plains Public Schools.
FASNY also promises to study traffic and mitigate possible problems by possibly: staggering school release times; sharing buses with other schools, handle all drop-offs on site; and restrict the use of local streets.
“…FASNY is willing to share its facilities with the community such as a gymnasium, cultural facilities and play areas for community use during off hours,” a fact sheet says. “Moreover, our school will be an asset to the City’s extensive educational community and will further enrich the cultural diversity of White Plains."
Members of the Gedney Association—a residential association representing the Gedney Farms neighborhood, where the former Ridgeway Country Club lies—have asked the common council to deny FASNY’s special permits for the property.
“It [the moratorium] sounds like a good first step,” said Gedney Association President Terence Guerriere
Guerriere said that though the moratorium was not directly associated with the French American School’s plans, he said he felt it was one step closer toward his hope that FASNY will not get special permits needed to run a school on at the former country club site. While the Gedney Association and other local groups say FASNY’s plans are not in line with the comprehensive plan, FASNY says their plan is a low-density development is.
The comprehensive plan says:
If the [golf] courses cannot be maintained as private courses, although clearly not a preferred scenario, the plan envisions residential development at the City’s lowest residential density, clustered to preserve open space and environmental features and providing public access to public and quasi-public areas including trailways linked to the City’s open space network.
“It is our firm belief that in addition to the special protections both public and private schools under New York State law that the FASNY campus as planned would be fully consistent with the City’s 1997 Comprehensive Plan,” said Thompson. “The Plan specifically provides that in the event that golf courses may not be ‘economically feasible’ any development should be clustered, maintaining the maximum open space. This is precisely how the FASNY campus is designed.”
A public hearing on the local law that would implement a moratorium is scheduled for March 7.
See the attached renderings of FASNY’s plans for the school, along with their fact sheets.
Ellen
6:43 pm on Friday, February 11, 2011
The French American School Board of Directors are a shrewed group of bankers and investors that could honestly care less about what the Gedney Way neighbors actually think. Why is it that they moved the Elementary School from Bryant Avenue over to Ridgeway and what do they plan on doing with that property off of Bryant Avenue? The proposal is incredibly dense. We are adding 1200 students, 250 teachers a day to that area. Are they serious??? They majority of the property they plan on "deeding" to the city will have to be maintained by the city. They do not plan on maintaining it at all. The majority of the land they say they will keep as open space can not be built on anyway because its wetlands. Do they really think we are that stupid? Aside from the fact they will not pay any taxes, they will cost the city about half a million in services...not including upkeep of the wetlands space. At least a developer would bring tax revenue, would have to repair and build the roads and sewers. This will be an absolute disaster for White Plains. Say NO to FASNY!
Dina Sciortino
7:25 pm on Friday, February 11, 2011
Hi Ellen, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and starting a conversation on the topic.
Ellen
9:13 am on Saturday, February 12, 2011
My pleasure. There is a lot you don't know. The Journal News is trying to portray these children of trying to learn in suboptimal conditions. Have you seen the buildings they are operating from now??? Far from shabby. If the walls need painting, paint them. Cost far less then the 60 million they are planning on spending to ruin a neighborhood. The chairman of the board, Mr. Zabotin indicated he was taken "aback" when he heard my husbands and my concerns because the project literally overwhelms our how. NOT TRUE!! He has been told by the seller, as well as the neighborhood council to speak directly with us because of the impact put directly on us. He agreed and indicated he would...that was long before the sale even went through....not even so much as a phone call. So what does that make Mr. Zabotin?????
Joseph
8:35 am on Saturday, February 12, 2011
FASNY seeks to build a massive campus in the middle of a residential neighborhood on one of the few remaining parcels of open space in White Plains. This plan will also bring a significant volume of traffic to an already-busy area.
FASNY will pay no taxes yet will place a burden on White Plains' services and its taxpayers when the City has experienced cuts in services due to budget constraints. Less than 5% of its students live in White Plains, so its families also pay no White Plains taxes. FASNY does not intend to keep the open space and maintain it for the benefit of the City. Rather, it will deed the undeveloped land, most of which is not developable anyway, to the City, and shift the maintenance cost to the City.
FASNY's PR firm portrays opposition to its plan as "well-heeled" Gedney Farms residents opposing its wonderful program, as per the recent Journal News articles. We should not fall victim to its divisive, class-warfare tactic. They wish to have White Plains overlook the facts: this plan is harmful to the City and the neighborhood, and FASNY imposes burdens on the City, so that its "well heeled" -- $20g+ tuition -- out of town families can take advantage of White Plains.
Ellen
9:22 am on Saturday, February 12, 2011
Joseph, don't know who you are but YOU ARE SO RIGHT. Before reading your comment my husband used those exact same words, "class-warfare tactics." I hope you plan on attending meetings and speaking up. FASNY would like to everyone believe it's a done deal. Far from it. We just have to convince the council and remind them who they represent...They bring absolutely nothing positive to the city!
Dan Seidel
9:49 am on Saturday, February 12, 2011
Zarin and Zabotin can point to NO EXACT LAW - merely "case law" - they are NOT using the religious school law, as this is not a religious schoool. They are subject to a Special Permit grant - WHICH MUST BE DENIED. Okay let's start with property values and open space - Google this one for starters (this gets real tedious):
Open Space, Residential Property Values, and Spatial Context
Soren T. Anderson
Department of Economics, University of Michigan
125 Lorch Hall
611 Tappan Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Sarah E. West*
Department of Economics, Macalester College
1600 Grand Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55105, USA
Ellen
2:00 am on Tuesday, February 15, 2011
They have an open house, serve crousants and put up a large sign indicating that because they are a school they can not be denied a special use permit and indicating this is NY LAW. Not only are they liars but this form of intimidation and manipulation is just the start. They will continue to tell half truths to get their way. The Journal News article trying to paint the picture of these poor children being forced to learn in suboptimal conditions is pure nonsense. If the walls need to be painted then paint them but the properties they are operating out of now are very nice!!!
Linda J. Eisen
11:29 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011
I have been wanting to thank Ellen, Joseph, and Dan for their well written, well thought out compassionate comments regarding FASNY. This plan, will forever change our neighborhood and the propaganda that we are being fed as to why we should rejoice on their coming is just undermining our intelligence. First they say it will increase property values and now they slipped in that property values will at least be maintained. For so many years I have sold Real Estate and those properties backing on or ajacent to buildings of all sorts as well as highly trafficked streets reduce the interest in and value of the properties effected. I now look out on what was lovely open space and feel the doom that we are facing and as tax payer in White Plains for going on over 38 years I am offended by those who think our neighborhood is the only one that will pay the price if this plan is to go through.. It must not!
Ellen
12:17 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Linda, you are so right. It's not just those in other neighborhoods but in our own neighborhood. I stood at the open house while neighbors walked up to the proposed plan and let out a sigh of relief because they lived further down Hathaway, on Oxford and Little John, etc. and felt that it wouldn't be "so bad" for them. It's just plan ignorance. They are proposing to put a preschool, elementary school, middle school and highschool buildings within approximately 12 acres of land. Where do you think that traffic is going to go??? Where do you think all those buses are going to go? Certainly Ridgway, even with an additional turn lane can't possibly handle it. So not only don't they pay taxes but the value of the homes in the area go down and so does the taxes that we pay to the city. Not only that, they will be drawing from our police, fire, garbage etc, drawing from our public school for both books and special needs and they are offering to "deed" the wetland they can't even build on anyway, to the city to maintain. They will ruin a neighorhood and at the same time cost taxpayers $$$$.
Linda J. Eisen
1:43 pm on Saturday, February 19, 2011
Yes Ellen...someone said..."NIMBY" ( not in my back yard) but what eveyone does not understand is that all yards will be effected and not positively!!
Linda J. Eisen
12:47 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011
The Common Council meeting of last evening. First thank you to all those residents who spoke and to our honorable, and extremely patient, Mayor and council members. Emotions on all sides of course were high. I must say it was very difficult to listen and to watch. There were three families from the FASNY school who presently live in White Plains and many more who do not. What was difficult to listen to was people telling us what is good for us and why their coming should be a dream realized. They came from New Rochelle, Connecticut, Rye, and Larchmont, and perhaps elsewhere. I wonder why they didn't choose White Plains originally! There seemed to be inuendo to our city leaders as to why the moratorium sounds suspicious and how they hoped it was not directed to them, which was insulting as well. Watching...well that was difficult too. The reason it was hard, it had to do with FASNY representatives and people who spoke on behalf of the school, returning to their seats and grimacing at those from our community who feel their dream is our nightmare. Arrogance is not the way to win us over.
A big thank you to Dan S. as he could not have said it better!!
Linda
Dina Sciortino
12:53 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Hi Linda, Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Dan Seidel
5:52 pm on Tuesday, March 8, 2011
i was not scrubbed - commented on dif article. THANKS LINDA!!!