.
Feedback

Movie Reviews: The Expendables 2, Paranorman

80's and 90's action heroes unite in The Expendables 2, and stop-motion animation brings us another dark fairy tale.

The Expendables 2- 4 (out of 5)

Can a bunch of long-in-the-tooth action stars still substitute muscles, guns, and wisecracks for super heroes and special effects? Sylvester Stallone & Co. respond to that question with a resounding “hell yeah.” “The Expendables 2” is a “go-bigger” sequel that works and it does so because of exciting familiar faces.

This time a debt Barney (Sylvester Stallone) owes to Mr. Church (Bruce Willis) leads him and his team of mercenaries to Albania in order to recover a lost safe. Only once there they are ambushed by a villain named Vilain (Jean-Claude Van Damme), a cold-hearted bastard enslaving people from a neighboring village to mine weapons-grade plutonium. This of course cannot stand.

Arnold Schwarzenegger and Chuck Norris (making cheer-worthy entrances and deftly satirizing their old action movie personas) just complete the classic eighties/nineties action nostalgia this movie is going for. And while Bruce Willis is really the only one of this cast (which also includes Jet Li, Jason Statham, Dolph Lundgren, Randy Couture, Terry Crewes, and lone woman Nan Yu) you could really call an actor, there is also something to be said for charisma and these guys could make even the cheesiest line or dumbest plot twist seem all part of the campy fun. They’re very funny together (loved a scene where they discuss what they would want their last meal to be), especially a surprising Lundgren whose like Lurch from “The Addams Family” but also brilliant. Stallone leads this thing beautifully and I gotta say the anticipation of a final showdown between him and Van-Damme made me feel like a kid again and he doesn’t disappoint.

This of course is all formula. The meager plot about saving villagers (but who doesn’t want to get behind rooting for the guys saving the impoverished?), the cheesy dialogue, and over-the-top villains are all there but director Simon West creates non-stop adrenaline from all the bullets, explosions, fight choreography, and blood splatters until we roll into the final confrontation. It isn’t good filmmaking, but it doesn’t have to be. It’s still summer action season, and who’s more “action hero” than these guys?

 

Paranorman- 3 (out of 5)

Every kid has that movie that’s going to scare the crap out of them for the first time. The stop-motion animation studio Laika, which was behind 2009’s fantastic “Coraline” and now this Tim Burton-meets-low-rent monster movie mash-up “Paranorman,” again manages a good first step for scary movie virgins.

Norman (Kodi Smit-McPhee) is a young kid living in Blithe Hollow who’s a bit of an oddball, not just because of his stiff stand-up head of hair, but also that he talks to ghosts, his dead grandma (Elaine Stritch) chief among them. Neither his parents (Jeff Garlin, Leslie Bibb), sister (Anna Kendrick), or the torturous school bully (Christopher Mintz-Plasse) believe he has this power or care to listen. The only one who believes him is his deranged Uncle (John Goodman) who he learns may not be so deranged when he finds out that a centuries-old witches curse is real and that he must use his power to save the town from zombies.

Visually this is all terrific looking, especially if you’re a kid. Walls move and melt away, there are gothic flashbacks to Salem-like witch trials, all the gruesome loss of body parts that a PG rating will allow, and the finale is hauntingly suspenseful.

Unfortunately it’s also preachy, with a “listen to your kids, even if they’re weird” sort of moralizing that’s a bit depressing. And it’s true what they say about zombies; once they’re out of the ground, there isn’t all that much a screenwriter can do with them.

Luckily “Paranorman” has a dark sense of humor that occasionally brings a big chuckle. A scene where Norman must pry a necromancing book from the hands of a dead body is a potent jolt of physical comedy. The jokes about dumb high-school teenagers though? Didn’t care much for them. Mostly this works because of real solid visual craftsmanship, making “Paranorman” stand as some of the best animation of the year.

Brett Martin August 18, 2012 at 12:50 am
I think you and I agree on The Expendables 2. Here is my review of the film, as seen on several Patch sites
http://rosemont.patch.com/articles/the-expendables-2-is-loud-dumb-action-filled-fun-fa5a6946#video-11050989

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from White Plains Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Colleen R. Brathwaite June 12, 2013 at 12:23 pm
I'm glad to see someone else put on paper some of the reaction I have had to being required to pay aRead More fee to park at WestMed. I think the fee is unconscionable! I was even more insulted when I received a tone-deaf response to my complaint about the fee from the head of WestMed. I understand that WestMed ended up paying considerably more for the parking facility than anticipated, but that's no justification for charging clients who have no choice but to park there in order to receive vital services. It's a gross insult to the patients. It's not our fault that WestMed had to cough up more dough. With new WestMed locations being opened every few months, clearly the company is not hurting financially. And, what's most ridiculous, is that they hired a staff of four or five parking attendants to issue tickets and instruct us how to pay for the parking! Why not use their salaries to help defray the facility's cost? You're right that it's pure greed because WestMed could have chosen to recoup the cost more slowly and not charge a fee. When I expressed my displeasure about the fee to my doctor, he posed an interesting question: when the facility's cost is paid off, will WestMed continue to charge for parking? By this time, WestMed has certainly recouped enough of the cost to make a dent in the overall expense. It's time to get rid of the fee and restore some dignity to what used to be a fine organization. In the past I heartily recommended family, friends and many others to WestMed. Now, I've got a very nasty taste in my mouth about WestMed! Shame on you, WestMed!
Clifford Blau June 15, 2013 at 09:48 am
It's not true that parking is required. You could do as I do and walk there (assuming it isRead More actually the White Plains office you are referring to and not Harrison), or take a bus, or a taxi, or have someone drop you off and pick you up. And if you aren't happy with their service, go somewhere else. There are lots of doctors not affiliated with Westmed.
Cathy G June 15, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Clifford, thanks for your two cents! How lucky for you that you can walk to your doctor's office andRead More not have to pay to park!