.
Feedback

Gay Marriage Rights, From a Gay Person!

Gay Marriage rights. Who has the right?

Let's talk about style—not the style you wear, but the style you live.

Everyone lives a different lifestyle. Some choose to live in seclusion. Some choose to live in nudist colonies. Some become priests or nuns. Some choose to be drug dealers, and some choose to be terrorists.

The one lifestyle you cannot choose is to be gay.

It's a naturally born lifestyle. To most gay people, it's a lifestyle no one wants to talk about or ask questions about. It's a lifestyle that people will make fun of or bash gay people for. It's the topic that can shut down a party, quiet the loud mouth or just gross out your neighbor.

What most people don't realize is that being gay does not mean you can catch it from talking to a gay person. Or if you hug a gay friend, you’re automatically gay. That's not how it works. In the words of Lady Gaga, we were born this way baby!

Usually you know from a young age, and either choose to repress it or you go with it and live your life—often in pure torment. Growing up in a very Italian household in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn—with very strong connections to some tough people—you learn to hide your true self, to avoid being abused.

Abused by your own family, abused by your friends. So you go through the motions of living a "normal" life, when really all you’re doing is abusing yourself by keeping your true self hidden. Hiding my true feelings led me to try to fit in, and become a father at the age of 18. 

I then had to really hide myself and try to live a "normal" life. Finally, I realized it was unfair to my child and the woman that gave me my child. So on top of being a teenage dad—I had to support a family and teach my child about life, all while I was afraid of my own lifestyle.

It was years later that I finally came out—but only to my immediate family, my child and her mom. Some of my childhood friends and some of my clients are finding out now, for the first time, that I am gay and can finally get married. Yes, I have been asked to do , being gay and being a parent. First I thought it would be fun and I thought it would be great for my daughter to have a good nest egg for her future, as she is starting college.  

But would it open the floodgates for more abuse? More torment? More comments and more fear?  Is that really fair? Should I have to worry that my daughter is going to be cursed at? Or someone might attack her or myself? Or her mom for that matter? 

I know that we will have supporters, but we will also have haters. And the haters are the ones that can ruin everything. Lives, careers, futures. My haters didn't ruin my life; because I left the tough town I grew up in and made my way to a place where I felt safe.

But there are many people that stay where they are, and fight every single day—just to get through work, or pay for their groceries without someone calling them a “faggot” or a “dyke.” In this day and age when slavery is over and we are a free country, we still have to be enslaved in our closet.

Passing the bill to allow gay people to marry in New York was tremendous in the year 2011. But it took so long to start the process of freeing us. I have been getting emails and questions about it from people who know I am gay—asking what my feelings are, if I was planning on getting married, etc. etc.

My feelings are that it never should have been an issue. My right to marry whoever I love should always have been mine. My lifestyle never should have affected you.

My lifestyle—however I choose to live it—is just that, my lifestyle.

It's a sad world when we can fight for freedom for people in other countries; we can elect our first black president here, but yet until days ago I couldn't marry someone I chose to love, in my home town, like everyone else.  

And President Obama—why are you dancing around the idea of gay marriage?  

Don’t you know that your own parents would not have been allowed to marry in some states when they did? Seriously Barack? You broke major barriers with your win. And now so did we, but only in a handful of states. Your support of marriage equality would make a difference. Isn’t it time for you to stand up for our basic civil rights?  

And to the haters: until you pay the bills for the gay person in line buying groceries—keep your mouth shut. The only thing you should be saying is excuse me, thank you and have a good day. Keep the ignorant and hurtful comments to yourself.  

I'm someone's child. I have a heart. I have feelings and I'll be the first one to help a stranger in need. Would you?

White Plains resident Julius Michael is the author of this column and the trusted stylist to many high-end Westchester clients. See his website at www.JuliusMichael.com or reach him at , 1 Christie Pl. Scarsdale, at 914.725.1123

Earl July 3, 2011 at 01:46 am
"Isn't the commitment and love of one person for another what's sacred, not the legal registration of a marriage?"
Exactly! Thats Why it could have been called a civil union!
Beachdudeca July 3, 2011 at 01:53 am
Earl, excempt Marriage and Civil Union are not the same and both should be an option. This is not about expanding something , rather this about allowing a group an option they should have always had.
Married couples have 1,138 federal rights, protections and responsibilities such as: •Social Security benefits upon death, disability or retirement of spouse, as well as benefits for minor children. •Family and Medical Leave protections to care for a new child or a sick or injured family member •Workers' Compensation protections for the family of a worker injured on the job •Access to COBRA insurance benefits so the family doesn't lose health insurance when one spouse is laid off •ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) protections such as the ability to leave a pension, other than Social Security, to your spouse •Exemptions from penalties on IRA and pension rollovers •Exemptions from estate taxes when a spouse dies •Exemptions from federal income taxes on spouse's health insurance •The right to visit a sick or injured loved one, have a say in life and death matters during hospitalization.
Ginger July 3, 2011 at 04:15 pm
In reality, it is both and should be both.
Everyone in this country has a civil union. An annulment or a get means nothing legally. Just as a legal divorce does not dissolve a Catholic marriage. So let's at least be clear about definitions. My family in Europe marries twice. The first is a civil marriage, and the only marriage recognized by law. It contractually links the two people as a couple. The second is a religious marriage. It is neither required nor is it legal and it cannot occur without the first civil marriage. It's a brilliant and yet simple construct. If we were to adopt such a system here, ANYONE who chooses to marry can and must be married in a civil ceremony. This is the marriage that would grant the federal rights, protections and responsibilities. Anyone choosing to have a religious marriage can go ahead and do so. Not different than the way it is now, each religion would have it's own set of requirements and rules for who can marry in their house of worship. This way, religiously, everyone can read from their own book. Further, certain religions would be free blame to their bias and hatred on God (other higher power) as much as they like without dragging the government into it. They can sort it all out with God when they get there and He asks them WTF!
Dina Sciortino (Editor) July 6, 2011 at 03:42 pm
I <3 Julius!
John Craig July 6, 2011 at 06:27 pm
Julius, Very nice post. The only thing missing is a mention of www.itgetsbetter.org.
Conservative NYer July 7, 2011 at 11:31 am
Nicely done,good for you! I don't agree with the lifestyle because it goes against the grain of my foundation as a person. But I would never ostracize you for it as I have several family members who have partners and have so for many, many years. The difference is they do not force their lifestyle down my children's throat. So I ask please don't push your lifestyle down the throats of my children and my family. What you do in your bedroom and your life is your business. And how I raise my family is mine. I teach my children to be tolerant but that does not mean it's right for "our family" and those who have a different lifestyle also NEED to be tolerant of our conservative values as a family. It goes both ways. We will see what happens when the LGBT education get implemented into the NYS Public Ed. because I can guarantee you it will. It will be a NYS requirement to go on to the next grade. I can also guarantee the rights as a parent will be taken away and you will NOT be able to opt out your children either (for those of us who believe marriage is between a woman and a man). THEN we will see how just how tolerant those of the alternative lifestyle are and what the agenda of the LGBT will be when it comes to children that are not their own. Tolerant is not in the LGBT vocabulary/agenda when it comes to educating those who are NOT their children and insist every child learn it whether it goes against your family values or not. Look at CA and their Ed.! God Bless!
Fire Horn Lover July 7, 2011 at 12:03 pm
its hard to be tolerant towards people who think how some people are born is wrong, and how being something is one of the worst things someone can be
Ginger July 7, 2011 at 12:07 pm
Dear Conservative NYer,
If your family values include bias and exclude civil rights, I feel sorry for you. Clearly you have missed the point. I will pray for you. You do have the choice to opt out of public education. Or even better, home school your children so their education can be as narrowly defined as you see fit. But I ask please, do not force your "God" down the throats of ANY children or ANY family. What you do in your house of worship is your business. Keep it there.
Ginger July 7, 2011 at 06:50 pm
Not surprisingly, you quoted only that portion of the information that you believe supports your contention that homosexuality is unnatural.
You've left out that one study is two decades old and the other is over a decade old. You've also left out the conclusions. This is all without examining the very important collection of data. Self-reported means only that. Those cases that got reported by the victim. It does NOT include ALL cases. Sexual abuse is under-reported, especially same sex abuse on heterosexual males. I'm trying to understand how you made the leap that abusive treatment, even at the hands of a parent, somehow supports that being gay or lesbian is unnatural. If we extend this logic, then should we gather that you also believe being a female, being Black or being Jewish is similarly unnatural? Your efforts would be better well spent finding a way to let go of your hatred and self-loathing.
Ginger July 7, 2011 at 07:06 pm
A psychologist? Good grief. Please find a new career.
Meredith Lesly July 7, 2011 at 07:46 pm
None of this stuff about pedophilia and child abuse belongs here anyway. The article is not about sexual abuse.
Ginger July 7, 2011 at 07:49 pm
You are right, Meredith. Some ignorance is so loud it is difficult to ignore.
teevoz July 7, 2011 at 09:18 pm
This column is about the civil rights issue of the right of people to marry. It has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia or HIV or any of the other scare words that have been used here with great offense to any fair-minded person. I am disgusted by it . This is really very simple: gay people are entitled to the same rights as straight people, and until our country recognizes the simple truth of this, we will be living in a prejudiced, discriminatory country. Just like we were when miscegenation was illegal - the right of Barack Obama Sr. to marry Ann Dunham in 1961 in any state that they wished, which they did not have. (continued in next comment)
teevoz July 7, 2011 at 09:19 pm
We do not, as a country founded on equality, have any justification for continuing to discriminate against a segment of the population who are only seeking the same rights that the majority have. Someone said that civil unions should suffice - well, I actually agree that we all would be best off if there were no difference between marriage and civil unions - in other words, if the government ONLY granted civil unions - to straight as well as gay couples - and got out of the business of defining marriage. Go to your church or synagogue or mosque or other spiritual organization if you want some kind of religious sanction to your union. But the government, a civil authority, should only provide civil ceremonies. It is very common in Europe for people to have two weddings - Prince Albert of Monaco just did it: a civil marriage officiated by a government official - like a justice of the peace - and a religious marriage conducted by his church. We should do the same, and stop this discrimination, country-wide. And to the person here hell-bent on proving that homosexuality is evil, or an illness, or an excuse for child abuse, or any of the other nonsense you've been spewing - enough already. Go start a blog of your own and spew away - no one here is interested in any more of your ravings, and I strongly encourage other commenters to ignore her ignorant and offensive posts and wait until she crawls away. Responding to her only encourages her - she is feeding off of it.
Meredith Lesly July 7, 2011 at 09:22 pm
I agree, teevoz, and I should never have dignified this bigotry with a response. I'm sorry.
Dina Sciortino (Editor) July 7, 2011 at 09:25 pm
question, which is whether someone—whether they are homosexual because they were sexually abused or not, which is something they would have had no control over—should be able to marry who they choose in this country. Or we can all agree to disagree =
Meredith Lesly July 7, 2011 at 09:26 pm
I think it should all be removed. This is not what most people coming to read this article expects or wants.
(it's "rein", as in horses, btw.)
Ginger July 7, 2011 at 09:33 pm
I, too, agree. Her belligerent ignorance got the best of me. Shame on me for trying to reason with the unreasonable.
Jill Gertz July 7, 2011 at 11:28 pm
Actually other pro homosexual marriage posters brought chirch abuse up. I answer factually and dispassionately and posts get censored. So much for any journalistic standards at the Patch
Jill Gertz July 7, 2011 at 11:34 pm
Gay people have the same rights - they just can't marry same sex just like I cant marry my brother. Should I fight for "equality" to marry a brother? The homosexual groups speak in slogans and civil rights jargon in arguments that make no rational sense. Two left feet is not the same as a left and right and no amount of jargon can make it so. Of course a mixed race normal couple can still mate and create a family. Homosexuals can't so even nature discriminates - the comparison with mixed race couples is bogus.
Ross Revira July 7, 2011 at 11:38 pm
Why is it always the same cast of characters who yell from the rooftops about the abuse of civil rights by the majority are the first to demand censorship when they don't like what is said?
Jill Gertz July 7, 2011 at 11:44 pm
I posted facts - abuse and disease studies from the CDC. Comments from a president of the APA. I quoted the DSM IV. I responded to other peoples questions about my view of church abuse. I posted more factual things than anyone here. People in this thread only post slogans and jargon. The original author said homosexuality was natural and anyone who thinks otherwise the writer says to "keep your mouth shut." That's typical of the homosexual groups bullying that is shown to anyone who disagrees with them. I posted truth and people here couldn't deal with it. Truth feels like hate to people who hate the truth.
Meredith Lesly July 7, 2011 at 11:59 pm
I don't like what she said, in part because it's so distorted. But I said it should be removed because there isn't somewhere to move that very different discussion, or I would have recommended moving it instead.
Dina Sciortino (Editor) July 8, 2011 at 12:00 am
We only remove comments that violate our terms of service, which you agree to when you create your Patch account.
The Truth Hurts July 8, 2011 at 12:24 am
I guess "THE TRUTH HURTS"
Meredith Lesly July 8, 2011 at 12:31 am
And thus another article's discussion is killed.
Conservative NYer July 8, 2011 at 01:21 am
Clearly I did not miss the point because I am NOT bias and nor did I say anything about the LGBT having no civil rights. Why don't you show me where in my post that I am bias? You obviously missed my point Ginger. I am all for those who have an alternative lifestyle to do whatever they please, get married, give birth to children, etc. I did not say anything derogatory about the LGBT lifestyle just that it is not for my family due to our beliefs. As for forcing God down anyone’s throat where in my post did I state that everyone should believe in "my god"? Your comment towards me holds no water and is clearly prejudice due to my beliefs. Where is your tolerance towards someone who has other views??? (As for the United Indoctrination Educational Centers my children do not attend them. I just feel bad for those parents whose children do and can't get the out due to whatever reasons and will be forced with a progressive agenda that they do not believe in because they have to attend the public school system.) God Bless..
Julius Michael July 8, 2011 at 04:10 am
Jill I am the original author of this blog. I would love to meet you in person and have a conversation with you. You seem like a lot of fun!
Laura Ali July 10, 2011 at 02:03 pm
Everyone in America should read this wonderful article. You are an amazing man who should be very proud of himself. I'm making my 3 kids read this today. As a republican I am a strong Gay Marriage advocate and I am not going to stop until the backwardness of this crazy opposition ceases. Obama should be ashamed of himself for not taking a stronger stand. I wish I was president (just for a month). I would!!!
thomas puls September 7, 2011 at 08:30 pm
Dear Jill,
Sorry for my lateness to the party as I have just learned of this site.If you post facts please allow me to correct you on one. Nature does not discriminate as gays can procreate and create a family, donating egg and sperm respectively. As to your "equality" to marry your brother? fine if you wish however do not ask me to help pay for your offsprings "two left feet " ...YOUR WORDS THP

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from White Plains Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Clifford Blau June 15, 2013 at 09:48 am
It's not true that parking is required. You could do as I do and walk there (assuming it isRead More actually the White Plains office you are referring to and not Harrison), or take a bus, or a taxi, or have someone drop you off and pick you up. And if you aren't happy with their service, go somewhere else. There are lots of doctors not affiliated with Westmed.
Cathy G June 15, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Clifford, thanks for your two cents! How lucky for you that you can walk to your doctor's office andRead More not have to pay to park!
Raymond Lautersack June 19, 2013 at 05:55 pm
There are two expenses that I always seem to have a difficult time accepting - parking fees andRead More tolls. I too was disappoint as I am sure many were to see that the WestMed Medical Group initiated a parking charge of $2.00 for each visit regardless of the time actually spent at the White Plains facility. Upon hearing this new policy I had to step back and look at what is going on around us and looking at the bigger picture. Parking fees are a way of life for all of us who live in and around White Plains. Tolls are a way of life for any who travel in New York State and New Jersey. A charge of $2.00 per visit is less than a cup of coffee and for the medical care received, you cannot put a price on it. A $2.00 parking fee does not make nor does it detract from the 'fine organization" that WestMed Medical Group has been and remains. My visits to WestMed Medical Group unfortunately have been far more over the past several years than I care to admit however I have the complete satisfaction and comfort knowing that I am getting the best care that I can get anywhere, near and far. I am always treated professionally, with respect and never leave feeling rushed, uninformed or uncomfortable with anyone that I have come in contact with which includes the building receptionist, the clerical staff at check in and all those beyond the waiting room areas. We must be our own health advocate and if anyone feels rushed, I would suggest that they slow the pace down with the doctor and perhaps make use of the WestMed web site and send a secure message to the doctor a few days prior to your appointment with your specific concerns and issues that you'd like to discuss. When everyone is prepared, things will go much easier and timing will not be an issue. I have even had the opportunity to use the WestMed Medical Group Ambulatory Center at Theall Road in Rye. I've used both White Plains Hospital and Greenwich Hospitals in the past and they are both excellent however I found equal if not better attention and care at the Theall Road Ambulatory Center. As for where the Customer Service Center is, it should not make any difference with the service provided. If running a Center is North Carolina is more efficient and cost effective, than so be it. It is not like moving jobs outside the country as so many corporations have done and continue to do. Everyone you speak to in the Center speaks well, has the doctors calendar and the ability to make an appointment for any open time frame. What more would anyone expect of a Service Center whose mission it is to make timely appointments for patients to see the doctor of their choice.