.
Feedback

Mother of Christmas Fire Victims to Sue City

Madonna Badger said officials intentionally destroyed evidence that would earn her compensation for property loss as well as distress.

 

The mother of three Windward School students at their Stamford home intends to sue the city for property damage and for intentionally destroying evidence that would substantiate further compensation related to emotional and mental distress, according to legal documents filed by a Massachusetts-based attorney.

Madonna Badger's parents also died in the blaze.

According to Statutory Notice of Claim filed with the by Rehoboth, MA-based Corso Law LLC, Madonna Badger as a result of the suffered more than $3 million in property damage, as well as "personal injury and civil rights violations arising from and as a result of the nelgigent and otherwise wrongful conduct of the City of Stamford."

The notice says specifically that city officials who the home at destroyed and removed the home and "its , appliances, meters, and other contents" resulting in "the intentional spoilation of evidence and the deprivation of remedies otherwise available to the claimant."

The notice says Badger "also sustained personal injuries, suffered extreme emotional distress and mental anguish for which she would be entitled to recover compensation from the responsible parties but for the intentional spoilation of critical and relevant evidence at the direction of the city."

The notice names two Stamford officials specifically: Chief Building Official Robert DeMarco and Director of Operations Ernie Orgera.

Stamford Director of Legal Affairs Joseph Capalbo was not immediately available for comment. Frank C. Corso, who filed the notice, declined to comment when reached by Patch, citing pending litigation.

The Stamford Christmas Day fire made international headlines and . Badger reportedly about one month after the tragedy.

Badger's notice follows a similar notice filed by her husband, Matthew Badger , which was filed on his own behalf and on behalf of the children, Sarah, Grace and Lillian.

Madonna Badger's notice states: "Madonna Badger's damages arising from the perils of the fire, including the negligent infliction of emotional distress she endured while in the zone of danger and while attempting to rescue her children and parents are continuous and permanent."

The City of Stamford has already any action brought against it relating to the fire, including .

The complaint from Madonna Badger was filed May 29, 2012. Madonna also lost her mother and father, Pauline and Lomer Johnson, in the fire.

Here is a timeline of events from Sunday, Dec. 25:

3:00 a.m. - Shortly before or after this time, an unidentified resident of 2267 Shippan Ave., according to Stamford fire marshals, tossed a yule log that had been burning in the home's fireplace into either a trash enclosure or a mudroom on the first floor.

4:40-4:52 a.m. - A wood ember ignited at an unknown point during this time frame and spread quickly through the first floor and then to the upper floors. Homeowner Madonna Badger and her companion Michael Borcina escaped from the home and neighbors alarmed by Badger's cries for help called emergency response at 4:52 a.m.

4:58 a.m. - 's first team arrived at 2267 Shippan Ave.

"Firefighters from Engine 4 used a portable 24-foot ladder to reach a second floor roof and then climbed scaffolding to get into the home’s third floor to begin search and rescue efforts for the three children and two adults," Stamford firefighter Brendan Keatley wrote in a statement to Patch.

This team, led by SFRD captain Mark Shannon, were repelled by the heat and the heavy flame on the third floor.

5:00 a.m. - A second team of firefighters arrive and moved to extinguish the fire, which was out of control, according to Stamford fire investigators. "Forty six firefighters utilizing 12 pieces of fire apparatus" responded to the fire, Keatley said.

5-5:10 a.m. - The first response team left the home and Borcina informed them that the children may have already gone down to the second floor. The team again tried to enter and were again pushed out by the fire and flame within the home.

Another SFRD team arrived to assist with the flames, however, the possibility of rescue was already gone.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from White Plains Patch? Find your Local Patch »

justme June 1, 2012 at 12:23 am
This was a tragedy plain and simple...the fact that this woman now wants compensation..utterly disgusting...Yes she lost sooo much but now to try to capitalize on that loss...makes it look like she didn't care and isn't still suffering..Mo' Money, Mo'Problems...Wow, Madonna...Classy move...grieve, and move on..don't profit...sickening...
Paula June 1, 2012 at 08:30 am
Oh, God, she lost so much, I can't imagine what she's going through, but doesn't she realize that she's putting the city in the position of needing to defend itself by pointing out her folly in having a man sleep in her house where her parnets and kids were staying who would do something so stupid as leave a bag of buning embers on her porch? I don't care if there was a sweet motive for doing it, in wanting to clear the way for Santa. If she is going to be blaming the city, they are going to be needing to point this out, and it's just going to be so much worse for her healing. I think people have not been pointing this out due to sympathy for what she is going through. I feel so sorry for her, but this lawsuit is just going to make it worse. Maybe they are not suing the boyfriend because he won't be as lucrative, or because then she'd really be all alone. Such a very sad story.
Racman63 June 1, 2012 at 10:12 am
I think the issue here is that the insurance company is either not paying or not paying what it should have if the City hadn't raised the structure and removed evidence useful to the insurance company in its investigation. That's my guess.
Paula June 1, 2012 at 10:40 am
Racman, I see what you mean. I remember that they did knock it down really fast and said it was to get rid of the danger.
I cant stand it anymore June 1, 2012 at 01:53 pm
I agree...Everyone wants to sue ..This country is going to hell...Someone inthat house caused the fire so now they want to bring a lawsuit against the city because of there negligent actions..thats a crime and she should be put in jail for this iresponsible lawsuit,,,
Linda Turturino June 1, 2012 at 07:30 pm
Again this is very tragic and this case as sensitive as it is should not be tried in the media or on social networking sites. Lives were lost and lives were changed forever... the evidence needs to be presented and see if there is a case. There could possibly be fault going all around but there are laws and this case should be given the attention for an honest outcome.
zane August 4, 2012 at 11:02 pm
NOAA reports that the temperature the night of the fire was 26 degrees. The embers were not hot enough to start the paper bag on fire in the 5 or 6 minutes it took to load the paper bag with the embers so then how can it be so that the embers have enough heat energy to ignite a garbage can of kitchen waste on fire when that garbage can of kitchen waste is frozen. I spoke to a combustion scientist at Yale University about this questionable chemical equation and he stated that the math of the burning needs further investigation. The embers did not start the fire. The insulation in that house was dry grass. The contractor, by installing the rigid foam insulation, exposed this 125 year old dry insulation to the outside elements. The outside elements included the ignition element. That ignition element is where the city should have began the investigation to find out what or who it was. I told this to the Stamford Police and then the story of the disposal of the embers changed from the garbage can to some place else shippan point august 5 2012
jen August 25, 2012 at 09:52 pm
justme: "the fact that this woman now wants compensation..utterly disgusting...Yes she lost sooo much but now to try to capitalize on that loss" I don't think you get the concept of what compensation is.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Colleen R. Brathwaite June 12, 2013 at 12:23 pm
I'm glad to see someone else put on paper some of the reaction I have had to being required to pay aRead More fee to park at WestMed. I think the fee is unconscionable! I was even more insulted when I received a tone-deaf response to my complaint about the fee from the head of WestMed. I understand that WestMed ended up paying considerably more for the parking facility than anticipated, but that's no justification for charging clients who have no choice but to park there in order to receive vital services. It's a gross insult to the patients. It's not our fault that WestMed had to cough up more dough. With new WestMed locations being opened every few months, clearly the company is not hurting financially. And, what's most ridiculous, is that they hired a staff of four or five parking attendants to issue tickets and instruct us how to pay for the parking! Why not use their salaries to help defray the facility's cost? You're right that it's pure greed because WestMed could have chosen to recoup the cost more slowly and not charge a fee. When I expressed my displeasure about the fee to my doctor, he posed an interesting question: when the facility's cost is paid off, will WestMed continue to charge for parking? By this time, WestMed has certainly recouped enough of the cost to make a dent in the overall expense. It's time to get rid of the fee and restore some dignity to what used to be a fine organization. In the past I heartily recommended family, friends and many others to WestMed. Now, I've got a very nasty taste in my mouth about WestMed! Shame on you, WestMed!
Clifford Blau June 15, 2013 at 09:48 am
It's not true that parking is required. You could do as I do and walk there (assuming it isRead More actually the White Plains office you are referring to and not Harrison), or take a bus, or a taxi, or have someone drop you off and pick you up. And if you aren't happy with their service, go somewhere else. There are lots of doctors not affiliated with Westmed.
Cathy G June 15, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Clifford, thanks for your two cents! How lucky for you that you can walk to your doctor's office andRead More not have to pay to park!