.
Feedback

Builder Chosen For New $3.1B Tappan Zee Bridge

Tappan Zee Constructors was awarded the contract. The selected bridge design has a construction time of five years, 2.5 months, is mass transit ready and meets environmental standards

The Thruway Authority voted on December 17 on Proposal 1 out of the three proposed designs for a new Tappan Zee Bridge and awarded the contract to construct the new Tappan Zee Bridge to Tappan Zee Constructors.

"After more than a decade of gridlock and millions of taxpayer dollars spent, we have ended the dysfunction of the past and have a new bridge proposal ready to break ground next year,” said Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, in a press release. “Following an extensive review of all three proposal submissions, the Thruway Board has selected the Tappan Zee Constructors' plan which offers New York toll payers the biggest bang for their buck - with the best price, shortest construction time, minimal dredging, and can accommodate mass transit in the future. This is a major milestone for a bridge project that was a metaphor for the dysfunction of government and is now a national model for progress." 

The selected design – proposal 1 – received the unanimous vote of the selection committee assigned this task earlier this month.

"It's clearly the best-value option, and will give us a crossing we can be proud of,” said David Aukland, who is on the selection committee. “This experienced builder will understand the importance of minimizing inconvenience for local residents during construction.  The Village expects to work closely with the Thruway Authority and the builder to avoid surprises, and to plan features that will be important to Tarrytown, such as the configuration of the pedestrian and bike landing." 

After a decade of study, Cuomo fast-tracked the project in 2011. There have been 80 community meetings and counting. The three proposals under consideration came by way of an unwieldy 750,000 pages in boxes. Wednesday’s presentation luckily arrived in a photo-full 23-page PDF.

The $3.1 billion design is the cheapest of the three proposals

  • Pricetag: $3.142 Billion
  • Construction time: 5 years, 2.5 months
  • Mass transit ready
  • Meets environmental standards

"This proposal provides the best price, the shortest construction time, and the least impact on the Hudson River," said Rockland County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef. "It maximizes the use of taxpayer and toll payer dollars."

"The selection of the proposal by Tappan Zee Constructors delivers on three critical fronts: cost, completion time, and mass transit readiness to carry express buses on day one,” said Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino. “And after so many years of gridlock, building a safer and less congested bridge as soon as possible is the most attractive option for Westchester. I thank the Governor and his team for their thorough review and for the appointment of the mass transit task force that will identify short, medium and long term transit solutions for the new bridge and the I-287 corridor."

The mass transit task force was announced earlier this month as well with 28 members.

Here are more statements from other local leaders on the new bridge selection: http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/12172012newtappanzeebridge

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from White Plains Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Colleen R. Brathwaite June 12, 2013 at 12:23 pm
I'm glad to see someone else put on paper some of the reaction I have had to being required to pay aRead More fee to park at WestMed. I think the fee is unconscionable! I was even more insulted when I received a tone-deaf response to my complaint about the fee from the head of WestMed. I understand that WestMed ended up paying considerably more for the parking facility than anticipated, but that's no justification for charging clients who have no choice but to park there in order to receive vital services. It's a gross insult to the patients. It's not our fault that WestMed had to cough up more dough. With new WestMed locations being opened every few months, clearly the company is not hurting financially. And, what's most ridiculous, is that they hired a staff of four or five parking attendants to issue tickets and instruct us how to pay for the parking! Why not use their salaries to help defray the facility's cost? You're right that it's pure greed because WestMed could have chosen to recoup the cost more slowly and not charge a fee. When I expressed my displeasure about the fee to my doctor, he posed an interesting question: when the facility's cost is paid off, will WestMed continue to charge for parking? By this time, WestMed has certainly recouped enough of the cost to make a dent in the overall expense. It's time to get rid of the fee and restore some dignity to what used to be a fine organization. In the past I heartily recommended family, friends and many others to WestMed. Now, I've got a very nasty taste in my mouth about WestMed! Shame on you, WestMed!
Clifford Blau June 15, 2013 at 09:48 am
It's not true that parking is required. You could do as I do and walk there (assuming it isRead More actually the White Plains office you are referring to and not Harrison), or take a bus, or a taxi, or have someone drop you off and pick you up. And if you aren't happy with their service, go somewhere else. There are lots of doctors not affiliated with Westmed.
Cathy G June 15, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Clifford, thanks for your two cents! How lucky for you that you can walk to your doctor's office andRead More not have to pay to park!