Crying foul over a budget process that sometimes leaves the minority party in the dark, Republicans from the Westchester County Board of Legislators are seeking change they say will bring additional transparency.
Republican legislators Michael Smith (District 3), Gordan Burrows (District 15) and Sheila Marcotte (District 10) proposed a resolution in September containing a provision that the county would not draw from its reserve balance for the 2013 budget. The provision would also ensure the 2013 budget has a zero percent tax increase and would provide the minority party, and public, 48 hours to review the budget between the additions and deletions process and when it goes to the chamber floor.
Smith, Burrows and Macotte joined John Ravitz, chief operating officer of the Business Council of Westchester, in support of the proposal Tuesday in front of the legislator's chambers in White Plains. The group said the proposal, which was voted down earlier this month, binds the county to a set of bi-partisan goals while ensuring all parties have a chance to review the budget.
“We need a framework,” Smith said. "We need a way to do this budget properly."
But with budget talks in their final stages, Democrats don't appear to agree to the same framework. BOL Chairman Kenneth Jenkins (D) said Tuesday no one has agreed to set a zero percent tax increase to date. Democrats also haven't agreed to stay out of the county's fund balance while constructing the 2013 budget.
“We’re focused on having all of the information and making intelligent decisions based on that," Jenkins said.
Republicans contend that dipping into the fund balance could reduce the county's bond rating. A reduced bond rating could lead to larger financial problems down the road.
Jenkins countered that using the fund balance is common practice, and downplayed the impact on the county's bond rating.
"It's the people's money, it's our savings account," Jenkins said. "We shouldn't be trying to stack up the piggy bank where people are going to get hurt."
Republicans said they have been left out of the budget process in past years, claiming that as the minority party in the BOL they once had less than 30 minutes to review a final county budget before it went to the floor.
“What is the problem with allowing the minority legislators in the body and the taxpayers of this county to have their fair voice in saying what this budget is?” Smith asked. “The 10 hours of discussion that goes on beforehand doesn't mean anything if the minority party gets 28 minutes to review a $1.7 million budget before it comes up for a vote.”
In response, Jenkins said Republicans have ample time to review the budget and participate in budget meetings through video conferences and conference calls. He added that the budget process has been in place for decades and the timeline, which begins in May, has already been established.
If Republican legislators want to change the process Jenkins said they would need to bring it to the County Charter Revision Committee.
“We’ve got to play by the rules all the time and not pick out the ones that we just don’t like," Jenkins said.
http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/spending_chart_1980_2017USb_09s1li111lcn_00f10f40f_Entitlement_Spending_Chart
http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/spending_chart_1980_2017USb_09s1li111lcn_00f10f40f_Entitlement_Spending_Chart
in layman's terms: Increase in "entitlement" spending by republicans from 1981-2012 = 1.058 TRILLION increase in spending by democrats over the same time = $560 billion That's right, not only has EVERY SINGLE PRESIDENT since at least 1981 increase entitlement spending but Republican presidents have increased "entitlement" spending at TWICE the rate of democratic president. Facts don't lie http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/spending_chart_1980_2013USb_09s1li111lcn_00f10f40f_En
increase in spending by democrats over the same time = $560 billion what's up with that?
When will the ax fall on the county cops? How's the reserve fund suffer from futher cutting the budget? I would think it would strengthen.
funny thing is, during the same 30 year period from 1981-2012, Republicans have added $8.3 trillion to the total debt while democrats have added 6.8 trillion. That's right, over the last 30 years Republicans have added debt at a faster rate than democrats. Again, not taking sides, these are just facts http://www.skymachines.com/US-National-Debt-Per-Capita-Percent-of-GDP-and-by-Presidental-Term.htm
http://www.usgovernmentdebt.us/spending_chart_1980_2013USb_09s1li111lcn_00f10f40f_En http://www.skymachines.com/US-National-Debt-Per-Capita-Percent-of-GDP-and-by-Presidental-Term.htm
1981-88 = start: 244.3 billion End: 440.66 Increase of 196.13 89-92 = Start: 440.66 billion End: 658.88 Increase of 218.42 93-00 = Start: 658.88 billion End: 976.91 Increase of 318.03 01-08 = Start: 976.91 billion End: 1620.08 Increase of 643.17 09-12 = Start: 1620.08 billion End: 1913.04 Increase of 292.96 Basic math. FYI our latest president has actually increased entitlement spending by the LEAST amount over the last 30 years
I'll do you one better, I'll use Carter too (last democratic president before Clinton) and assume Obama increases entitlement spending by the same amount during his next term. Carter increased it by $90 billion and if Obama adds another 290 billion, the 610 + 90 + 292 BARELY crack the $990 billion mark. Still less than Republicans. And if you don't wanna assume what Obama will spend, fine just include Carter then. That's 690 billion compared to 1.06 trillion with republicans only having 4 more years in office. 4 years does not account for over $370 billion, as no democrat has ever increased it more than 310 billion.
they don't add up? I'm pretty sure that's EXACTLY how you calculate the rate of spending. Again, don't be mad because numbers go against basic generalizations that are not based on facts. you're so deeply entrenched in these basic generalizations you don't even bother to analyze numbers with basic math
increase in Entitlement Spending rate = increase in spending/time Republicans: 1.06/ 20 = $53 billion per year Democrats : 610 billion/12 = 50.8 billion It doesn't get simpler than this. They increased entitlement spending 1.2 billion a year more than democrats