.
Feedback

Compassion Speaks: Responding in Truth and Compassion

The response of LCWR to the Vatican decree against them embodies compassionate principles.

by M. Doretta Cornell, RDC

I would like to share with you a compassionate response in the face of grave stress, like the ones I wrote of a few months ago.  A little background information: I was a member of this conference, LCWR, for the past eight years; since my terms in leadership are over, I am no longer a member.  The present Leadership Team of my congregation does belong to the conference.


As you may have read in the newspapers since April, the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) received a severe reprimand from a Vatican office, accusing the conference of “serious doctrinal problems” and  “diminution of the fundamental Christological center and focus” of our lives.  In other words, they accuse sisters of having lost our true center, Jesus Christ, and of being not wholly Catholic in our understanding, practice, and teaching of our faith.  As a result, the conference was assigned an archbishop and two assistant bishops to oversee the “reform” of the conference, by revising its constitutions and publications and monitoring speakers for the annual assembly and other activities.

The document cited rather vague accusations – such as “radical feminism,” hearing speakers with inappropriate interpretations of scripture, and choosing to focus on social issues different from those chosen by the bishops for their focus – as evidence of LCWR’s distorting true doctrine and failing in their role as religious leaders.

Needless to say, this has caused great grief and much sadness and anger among many sisters, myself included!  

In the fifty years since the Second Vatican Council, we sisters have undertaken deep and difficult changes in order to become more faithful to both the Gospel message and the intentions of each community’s founders, as well as the understanding of Church and today’s society laid out in the documents of the Council.  All of the changes were made from prayer, study of theology and scripture, communal discernment, and experimenting with possible ways to act before the changes were made.  To be accused of this sort of infidelity felt, and still feels, like betrayal and misinformed rejection of all that we are, as well as what it means to be the People of God.

The leaders of LCWR, in keeping with their principles of living a truly Christian life and responding out of their own integrity, are demonstrating the sort of compassionate response that I spoke of in several previous blog entries.

First of all, the leaders – president, past president and president-elect – issued no reply until they had had time to experience their own feelings, and to pray individually and communally.  They then consulted with one another and with the national board, which includes representatives of all thirteen regions of the country.  Other related groups and commissions also were contacted, and all members of each region were invited to gather for discernment, and insights from sisters in each community were also invited.

Finally, last weekend, the presidency and the national board engaged the 900 leaders of religious communities present at the annual Assembly in communal prayer and discussion about the official LCWR response would be.

Two short paragraphs from the press release following the Assembly will give you a sense of the results of this prayer and consultation:

      The assembly articulated its belief that religious life, as it is lived by the women religious who comprise LCWR, is an authentic expression of this life that must not be compromised....
 
      The assembly instructed the LCWR officers to conduct their conversation with Archbishop Sartain [the chief overseer] from a stance of deep prayer that values mutual respect, careful listening and open dialogue. The officers will proceed with these discussions as long as possible, but will reconsider if LCWR is forced to compromise the integrity of its mission.

Here we see both respect for the opponent and fidelity to our truth: the leaders will attempt to enter into dialogue with the overseeing bishops, hoping to explain why our position seems so contrary to that of the Vatican office.  At the same time, the leaders will not be complicit in distorting who and what women religious in the United States are.

The outcome of the dialogue with Archbishop Sartain remains to be seen, of course.  However, the leaders of LCWR are concerned not only with that outcome.  Their primary concern is that they act according to the Gospel principles of loving others, even when to those who present themselves as adversaries.  LCWR is refusing to take an adversarial stance.  They will proceed as  leaders of religious communities, faithful members of the church, speaking to other religious leaders, representing the leaders of that church.  Much forgiveness and many hours of deep prayer will guide the next steps of LCWR. 

We invite you to join your prayers to ours for a peaceful outcome.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from White Plains Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Rebecca Boivin August 20, 2012 at 10:54 am
Thanks so much for such a clear and concise explanation of the situation and the response of LCWR. As I do my daily work for The Sisters of the Divine Compassion I am grateful for the opportunity to work for people who truly live their mission. I respect the process that sisters nationally have undertaken to enable them to answer the accusations with integrity, strength, intelligence and a true thoughtfulness for the direction of the church.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Colleen R. Brathwaite June 12, 2013 at 12:23 pm
I'm glad to see someone else put on paper some of the reaction I have had to being required to pay aRead More fee to park at WestMed. I think the fee is unconscionable! I was even more insulted when I received a tone-deaf response to my complaint about the fee from the head of WestMed. I understand that WestMed ended up paying considerably more for the parking facility than anticipated, but that's no justification for charging clients who have no choice but to park there in order to receive vital services. It's a gross insult to the patients. It's not our fault that WestMed had to cough up more dough. With new WestMed locations being opened every few months, clearly the company is not hurting financially. And, what's most ridiculous, is that they hired a staff of four or five parking attendants to issue tickets and instruct us how to pay for the parking! Why not use their salaries to help defray the facility's cost? You're right that it's pure greed because WestMed could have chosen to recoup the cost more slowly and not charge a fee. When I expressed my displeasure about the fee to my doctor, he posed an interesting question: when the facility's cost is paid off, will WestMed continue to charge for parking? By this time, WestMed has certainly recouped enough of the cost to make a dent in the overall expense. It's time to get rid of the fee and restore some dignity to what used to be a fine organization. In the past I heartily recommended family, friends and many others to WestMed. Now, I've got a very nasty taste in my mouth about WestMed! Shame on you, WestMed!
Clifford Blau June 15, 2013 at 09:48 am
It's not true that parking is required. You could do as I do and walk there (assuming it isRead More actually the White Plains office you are referring to and not Harrison), or take a bus, or a taxi, or have someone drop you off and pick you up. And if you aren't happy with their service, go somewhere else. There are lots of doctors not affiliated with Westmed.
Cathy G June 15, 2013 at 04:41 pm
Clifford, thanks for your two cents! How lucky for you that you can walk to your doctor's office andRead More not have to pay to park!